/    Measurement database » Batteries » CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or Westinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4Ah
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or Westinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4Ah

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity at high current: CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah (237280 mAh vs. 1536); Resistance: CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah (0.18 mΩ vs. 20).

ModelCALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 AhCALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah2024Read review →Westinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4AhWestinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4Ah2023Read review →
Capacity at high current, mAh2372801536
Resistance, mΩ0.1820
Weight, g4200660
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

Only in one review: Test current 2 A (Westinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4Ah); Energy 14.9 Wh (Westinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4Ah).

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah: The four cells exceeded their rated capacity, delivering about 240 Ah at a 40 A discharge.

Westinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4Ah: The battery tested below its rated 4 Ah capacity; the author suspects this unit may be defective.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: batteries