Comparison · Batteries

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity at high current: CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah (237280 mAh vs. 2500); Resistance: CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah (0.18 mΩ vs. 4.5).

Model	CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah2024Read review →	VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A2020Read review →
Capacity at high current, mAh	237280	2500
Resistance, mΩ	0.18	4.5
Weight, g	4200	86
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 3.2 V (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Current 55 A (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Capacity 2600 mAh (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Test current 40 A (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Price 16.49 $ (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A).

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah: The four cells exceeded their rated capacity, delivering about 240 Ah at a 40 A discharge.

VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A: The cells delivered 40 A and over 2500 mAh at 20–40 A, with low resistance; the author's only complaint is the price.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.