Comparison · Batteries

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity at high current: CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah (237280 mAh vs. 92950); Resistance: CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah (0.18 mΩ vs. 0.28).

Model	CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah2024Read review →	LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah2021Read review →
Capacity at high current, mAh	237280	92950
Resistance, mΩ	0.18	0.28
Weight, g	4200	2000
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Current 270 A (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Test current 90 A (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Energy 288.02 Wh (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Temperature rise 45 °C (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah).

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah: The four cells exceeded their rated capacity, delivering about 240 Ah at a 40 A discharge.

LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah: The cells exceeded rated capacity, had low impedance, and performed well at up to 90 A; voltage sag was pronounced in the freezer.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.