Comparison · Chargers

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX or S-500-14.2

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: S-500-14.2 (35 A vs. 5.5); Temperature rise: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX (76 °C vs. 80).

Model	Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX2023Read review →	S-500-14.22023Read review →
Power, W	160	500
Test current, A	5.5	35
Temperature rise, °C	76	80
Review conclusion	—	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 14.2 V (S-500-14.2); Current 35 A (S-500-14.2); In test 110 W (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Weight 55 g (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Price 33 $ (S-500-14.2).

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX: It supports many protocols but enters thermal protection after 7–8 minutes under high load; sustained 160 W is unavailable.

S-500-14.2: The charger works normally and passed the test, but its fan is noisy and it gets noticeably hot.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.