Comparison · Chargers
Choetech Q6006 or QC 3.0 charger
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: Choetech Q6006 (3.6 A vs. 3.2); Ripple: Choetech Q6006 (140 mV vs. 200); Temperature rise: Choetech Q6006 (73 °C vs. 115).
| Model |  Choetech Q60062020Read review → |  QC 3.0 charger2018Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Test current, A | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Under load, V | 20.22 | 5.21 |
| Ripple, mV | 140 | 200 |
| Temperature rise, °C | 73 | 115 |
| Review conclusion | With reservations | With reservations |
Only in one review: Voltage 20.3 V (Choetech Q6006); Current 3 A (Choetech Q6006); Power 61 W (Choetech Q6006); In test 67 W (Choetech Q6006); Efficiency 91 % (Choetech Q6006); No load 0.4 W (Choetech Q6006); Protection 4.7 A (Choetech Q6006); Price 20 $ (Choetech Q6006).
Choetech Q6006: A compact, well-built supply that works stably, but supports few protocols and can be replaced by the cheaper Q4004.
QC 3.0 charger: It delivers the rated current and regulates voltage well, but overheats and has high ripple at 5 V.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
