/    Measurement database » Power supplies » Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W or CTG-200W-12V
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W or CTG-200W-12V

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Ripple: CTG-200W-12V (160 mV vs. 1200); Efficiency: Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W (91 % vs. 86.5); Temperature rise: Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W (87 °C vs. 118).

ModelTrack power supply, 48 V, 200 WTrack power supply, 48 V, 200 W2026Read review →CTG-200W-12VCTG-200W-12V2025Read review →
Power, W200200
Ripple, mV1200160
Efficiency, %9186.5
Temperature rise, °C87118
Review conclusionWith reservationsRecommended

Only in one review: Voltage 12 V (CTG-200W-12V); Current 16.7 A (CTG-200W-12V); In test 208 W (Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W); Test current 19.2 A (CTG-200W-12V); Under load 12.162 V (CTG-200W-12V); No load 0.6 W (Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W); Protection 4.6 A (Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W).

Track power supply, 48 V, 200 W: Delivers about 208 W and performs well, but has notable 100 Hz ripple and a 50 V output capacitor.

CTG-200W-12V: Praised for its sound topology, overvoltage protection, and excellent regulation; the input capacitor is undersized.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies