Comparison · Power supplies

Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A or 12 V 3 A power supply

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: 12 V 3 A power supply (35.5 W vs. 34.7); Test current: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (6.8 A vs. 3); Ripple: 12 V 3 A power supply (10 mV vs. 150); Efficiency: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (80 % vs. 77); Temperature rise: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (120 °C vs. 132).

Model	Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A2017Read review →	12 V 3 A power supply2017Read review →
Voltage, V	5	12
Current, A	7.2	3
Power, W	36	36
In test, W	34.7	35.5
Test current, A	6.8	3
Ripple, mV	150	10
Efficiency, %	80	77
Temperature rise, °C	120	132
Review conclusion	Not recommended	Not recommended

Only in one review: No load 2.4 W (12 V 3 A power supply); Price 11 $ (Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A).

Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A: The charger fell short of its rated current and power and overheated under sustained load.

12 V 3 A power supply: Above 2 A, the supply overheats and behaves erratically; it is unsuitable for continuous use.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.