/    Measurement database » Power supplies » QS-36-12 or Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

QS-36-12 or Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: QS-36-12 (35 W vs. 34.7); Test current: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (6.8 A vs. 2.9); Ripple: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (150 mV vs. 350); Efficiency: QS-36-12 (85 % vs. 80); Temperature rise: QS-36-12 (95 °C vs. 120).

ModelQS-36-12QS-36-122026Read review →Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 ARaxfly, 5 V 7.2 A2017Read review →
Voltage, V125
Current, A37.2
Power, W3636
In test, W3534.7
Test current, A2.96.8
Ripple, mV350150
Efficiency, %8580
Temperature rise, °C95120
Review conclusionWith reservationsNot recommended

Only in one review: No load 0.7 W (QS-36-12); Protection 2.9 A (QS-36-12); Price 11 $ (Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A).

QS-36-12: Decent overall, but its real power is about 30 W, with substantial no-load ripple.

Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A: The charger fell short of its rated current and power and overheated under sustained load.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies