/    Measurement database » Power supplies » Weather-resistant 100 W 8.3 A or MN-100W12V
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

Weather-resistant 100 W 8.3 A or MN-100W12V

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: MN-100W12V (11 A vs. 8.5); Ripple: MN-100W12V (150 mV vs. 1000); Efficiency: Weather-resistant 100 W 8.3 A (86 % vs. 84.5).

ModelWeather-resistant 100 W 8.3 AWeather-resistant 100 W 8.3 A2026Read review →MN-100W12VMN-100W12V2025Read review →
Voltage, V1212
Current, A8.38.3
Power, W100100
Test current, A8.511
Ripple, mV1000150
Efficiency, %8684.5
Review conclusionWith reservationsRecommended

Only in one review: Protection 8.5 A (Weather-resistant 100 W 8.3 A); Temperature rise 98 °C (Weather-resistant 100 W 8.3 A).

Weather-resistant 100 W 8.3 A: Neat enclosure and protection, but limit load to 75–80 W at elevated ambient temperatures; ripple is high.

MN-100W12V: Despite a counterfeit input capacitor, it has low ripple, good construction, and delivers its rated power and more.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies