Comparison · Batteries

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or Samsung INR18650-25R

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity at high current: CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah (237280 mAh vs. 2500).

Model	CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah2024Read review →	Samsung INR18650-25R2015Read review →
Capacity at high current, mAh	237280	2500
Weight, g	4200	44
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Resistance 0.18 mΩ (CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah).

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah: The four cells exceeded their rated capacity, delivering about 240 Ah at a 40 A discharge.

Samsung INR18650-25R: The cells showed good consistency and about 2500 mAh when discharged at 14 A.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or Westinghouse WA640N-F1 6V 4Ah CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah CALB L173F230B LiFePO4 230 Ah or VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A

← All: batteries

« November 2026 »
Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30