Comparison · Chargers
Choetech Q6006 or ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: ZC823 v13 (ZC823P) (5 A vs. 3.6); Ripple: ZC823 v13 (ZC823P) (65 mV vs. 140).
| Model |  Choetech Q60062020Read review → |  ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)YZXstudio · 2019Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Power, W | 61 | 100 |
| Test current, A | 3.6 | 5 |
| Ripple, mV | 140 | 65 |
| Protection, A | 4.7 | 3.1 |
| Review conclusion | With reservations | With reservations |
Only in one review: Voltage 20.3 V (Choetech Q6006); Current 3 A (Choetech Q6006); In test 67 W (Choetech Q6006); Under load 20.22 V (Choetech Q6006); Efficiency 91 % (Choetech Q6006); No load 0.4 W (Choetech Q6006); Temperature rise 73 °C (Choetech Q6006); Price 20 $ (Choetech Q6006).
Choetech Q6006: A compact, well-built supply that works stably, but supports few protocols and can be replaced by the cheaper Q4004.
ZC823 v13 (ZC823P): The board supports several protocols, but the author could not get the claimed 100 W; the usual maximum was 3.1 A.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
