Comparison · Power supplies

HCF-36R or Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (34.7 W vs. 20); Test current: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (6.8 A vs. 3); Ripple: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (150 mV vs. 370); Efficiency: HCF-36R (86 % vs. 80).

Model	HCF-36R2025Read review →	Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A2017Read review →
Voltage, V	12	5
Current, A	3	7.2
Power, W	36	36
In test, W	20	34.7
Test current, A	3	6.8
Ripple, mV	370	150
Efficiency, %	86	80
Temperature rise, °C	120	120
Review conclusion	With reservations	Not recommended

Only in one review: Protection 3.1 A (HCF-36R); Price 11 $ (Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A).

HCF-36R: It delivers only about 18–20 W continuously and is suitable for low-power loads.

Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A: The charger fell short of its rated current and power and overheated under sustained load.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.