Comparison · Batteries

LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah or TrustFire 16340

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity at high current: LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah (92950 mAh vs. 638); Test current: LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah (90 A vs. 1).

Model	LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah2021Read review →	TrustFire 163402017Read review →
Capacity at high current, mAh	92950	638
Test current, A	90	1
Review conclusion	Recommended	Not recommended

Only in one review: Current 270 A (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Capacity 620 mAh (TrustFire 16340); Energy 288.02 Wh (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Resistance 0.28 mΩ (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Temperature rise 45 °C (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Weight 2000 g (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Price 54 $ (TrustFire 16340).

LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah: The cells exceeded rated capacity, had low impedance, and performed well at up to 90 A; voltage sag was pronounced in the freezer.

TrustFire 16340: Capacity is well below the claimed 880 mAh; the author’s only noted plus is the excellent packaging.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.