/    Measurement database » Power supplies » QS-36-12 or Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C)
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

QS-36-12 or Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C)

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C) (47 W vs. 35); Test current: Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C) (3.6 A vs. 2.9); Temperature rise: Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C) (70 °C vs. 95).

ModelQS-36-12QS-36-122026Read review →Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C)Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C)2023Read review →
Power, W3635
In test, W3547
Test current, A2.93.6
Protection, A2.93.6
Temperature rise, °C9570
Review conclusionWith reservations—

Only in one review: Voltage 12 V (QS-36-12); Current 3 A (QS-36-12); Ripple 350 mV (QS-36-12); Efficiency 85 % (QS-36-12); No load 0.7 W (QS-36-12).

QS-36-12: Decent overall, but its real power is about 30 W, with substantial no-load ripple.

Meanwell NET-35A (presumably NET-35C): The supply sustained about 45 W in a long test, but its model marking and original protection-resistor value caused confusion.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies