/    Measurement database » Batteries » QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP or 33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP or 33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: These devices have no measurements in common that would show one is better than the other. Compare the review conclusions below.

ModelQNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFPQNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP2026Read review →33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell2024Read review →
Voltage, V3.23.2
Test current, A4040
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

Only in one review: Current 30 A (33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell); Resistance 2.25 mΩ (33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell); Weight 270 g (33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell).

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP: Good cells with honest capacity, good thermal behavior, and fast charging.

33140 15Ah LiFePO4 cell: Capacity is close to the rating, but its behavior at 40 A puzzled the author, who recommends staying at 0.5–1C.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: batteries