Support the project on Patreon


Measurement database

Measurement database: chargers

Battery and USB chargers: current, efficiency, temperature rise and price.

  • 44devices
  • 43reviews
  • 12review recommends

In brief: The table contains 44 devices of 43 reviews; all figures are taken from the reviews themselves. Lowest ripple: ZC823 v13 (ZC823P), 45 mV. Highest efficiency: Choetech Q6006, 91 %. Highest power in test: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX, 110 W.

Shown: 44 of 44
DeviceVoltageVCurrentAPowerWIn testWRipplemVEfficiency%No loadWTemperature rise°CPrice$Conclusion
Charger based on LRS-200-12 with adapter boardRecommended · 2024

The modified charger lowers voltage after charging and, according to the author, operates more safely with batteries.

—————————
2 A chargerRecommended · 2023

A simple, inexpensive charger rated at 2 A; the author estimates its actual current at about 1 A.

—2———————
Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX2023

It supports many protocols, but sustains its rated power only briefly and overheats.

———110———76—
Baseus CCCP30UE 2A1CWith reservations · 2023

It supports many protocols and delivers up to 40.1 W, but overheats under load and the author considers it expensive.

——3040.170———16
204 W chargerNot recommended · Bluetti · 2023

The 204 W charger has a noisy fan that runs continuously without temperature control.

——204——————
S-500-14.2Recommended · 2023

The charger passed the test and works normally, but its fan is noisy and the output does not switch off after charging.

14.235500————8033
Charger for Makita batteriesRecommended · 2023

The charger pleased the author: it charges normally, slightly undercharges in one cycle, and still works after 25 cycles.

—363————8016.8
12 V 8 A chargerNot recommended · 2023

The author advised against using the charger because of its unsafe design.

128———————
U2With reservations · Vapcell · 2022

It supports four battery types and charges at up to 2 A, but the author considers it poor value at the stated price.

—2——————13.39
Vapcell S4 plusWith reservations · 2020

Works and measures capacity well, but the author notes slow post-test charging and no LiFePO4 support.

123—————72—
Choetech PD6008Recommended · 2020

Delivers the stated voltages and currents and handles 10% overload, but gets quite hot and supports few protocols.

205100110170——8138
Modiary MDA238Recommended · 2020

Well-built and disconnects after charging, but may fail to shut off after being reconnected.

42285————71—
Choetech Q6006With reservations · 2020

A compact charger with quality components and stable operation, but limited protocol support.

20.336167140910.47920
CHOETECH Q4004With reservations · 2020

It stably delivers the rated 60 W and up to 70 W, but runs hot with little thermal headroom at maximum power.

60—607020090—100—
Choetech Q5003Recommended · 2020

The charger handles load steadily and runs cool, but lacks cable-drop compensation and its claimed 3 A rating is overstated.

12318—150——812.54
ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)With reservations · YZXstudio · 2019

The board did not deliver the advertised 100 W; most modes were limited to 3.1 A, though the cause remains unclear.

——100—45————
Used QC 3.0 chargerWith reservations · 2018

It delivered the rated 8 A on the 5 V channel, but ripple is high and the QC port is faulty.

5840—200———3.4
QC 3.0 chargerWith reservations · 2018

It regulates voltage well and delivers its rated current, but overheats and has elevated ripple at 5 V.

12319.225200——115—
AUKEY PA-T15Not recommended · 2017

The PA-T15 had failures, QC3.0 did not work on the replacement, and AiPower outputs sagged under load.

——5442———65—
AUKEY PA-T12017

The PA-T1 was compared with the PA-T15; its QC2.0 output was about 5 V at no load, with no detailed tests reported.

—————————
BlitzWolf BW-S4Recommended · 2017

The charger delivered its rated 10 A without overheating, but ripple reached 200 mV and it lacks QC support.

510——20089———
24 V 10 A charger2017

The charger overheated; the author suspects an incorrectly selected output inductor was the cause.

2410———————
Opus 3100 v2.2With reservations · 2017

When discharging four lithium cells at 700–1000 mA, the charger overheats and interrupts the test; added airflow solves the problem.

—————————
12.6 V 3 A chargerWith reservations · 2017

It works, but runs hot and overstates voltage and current; the author recommends modifications.

12.63—————102.88.13
12.6 V 1 A charger for 3SNot recommended · 2017

Without reducing the current, the charger overheats and shuts down; the author recommends modifying it to 700–750 mA.

12.61—————155—
12.6 V 3 A chargerRecommended · 2017

Well-built and does not overheat, but does not fully stop charging; suitable if the battery is not left connected for long.

———————8513.7
5 V 3 A USB charger (power supply)Not recommended · 2017

Ripple is high at 2 A and the diodes overheat; the author advises limiting the load to 2 A.

——15—700————
Doogee Y6 charger2016

The included power adapter is rated at 5 V and 2 A; the phone charges in about two hours.

52———————
5 V, 6 A, 6-port chargerWith reservations · 2016

It passed the load tests, but has untidy assembly, no output inductor, and no Quick Charge.

5630—140——6621.99
Included charger2016

The included charger is rated for 1.5 A; the author noticed no significant difference in charging speed.

—1.5———————
Milwaukee M12/M18 chargerWith reservations · 2016

A well-made universal M12/M18 charger, but it had to be modified for the local mains supply.

—3———————
5 V 1 A chargerWith reservations · Leagoo · 2016

The charger works as intended without excessive heating, but is clearly budget-grade.

51———————
5 V 1 A chargerWith reservations · Ulefone · 2016

The charger is rated for 5 V and 1 A, but lacks input and output filters.

51———————
DOOGEE X5 MAX power supply (charger)2016

The compact charger is rated at 1 A; its case reached 51 °C while charging.

—1—————51—
Vernee Thor chargerWith reservations · 2016

The charger is rated at 5 V and 2 A, but charging the phone takes about three hours.

52———————
4.2 V, 500 mA chargerWith reservations · 2016

The author would rather not use the charger because of its quality and the need for a plug adapter.

4.20.5———————
Power supply includedWith reservations · 2015

The 2 A power adapter gets hot while charging the tablet, which draws about 2.3 A.

—2———————
FL-4H-LCD-DRecommended · 2015

The author liked the charger: its capacity readings are fairly plausible, but it gets very hot during discharge.

—1—————58—
4 V 1.5 A power supplyWith reservations · 2015

The included power supply outputs 4 V and is rated for up to 1.5 A; it gets slightly warm in use.

41.5———————
Nitecore i2With reservations · 2015

A versatile charger with reverse-polarity protection, but it makes noise, heats up when charging Ni-MH/Ni-Cd, and the author finds it expensive.

—0.5———————
SC6038 charger with balancing for a battery made from two lithium cellsRecommended · 2015

The DIY SC6038 charger works; set for 400 mA, its current fell to 350 mA after warming up.

———————100.1—
Onda V891W power supplyWith reservations · 2015

It charges the tablet, but the author doubts it can deliver the rated 2.5 A.

52.5—————45—
12.6 V 350 mA chargerWith reservations · 2014

The charger is reasonably well made, but its measured charging current is below the stated value.

12.6——————40—
Charger for ECT CE4W-2Recommended · 2014

The charger is neatly assembled, and the author found no fault with it.

—————————

Figures were automatically extracted from review text, and each one was checked against a quote from the review. Measurement conditions vary: see the review for details. Prices are as of the review date. A dash means the review text does not include this value.

Share table

Updated · kirich.blog

See also